Yes that is correct. I would like a large body of experience and consenus to rely on as opposed to the regular 'trust the experts' argument, which has been shown for decades that is a deeply flawed and easy to manipulate argument.

▲

bonsai_spool an hour ago | parent [-]

> Yes that is correct. I would like a large body of experience and consenus to rely on as opposed to the regular 'trust the experts' argument, which has been shown for decades that is a deeply flawed and easy to manipulate argument.

Yes, it is far inferior to the 'Trust torginus and his ability to understand the large body of experience that other actual subject-matter-experts have somehow not understood' strategy

	▲	torginus 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's not my credibility I want to measure against Anthropic's. I just said to apply the same logic to biology you would apply for software development. The parallels here are quite remarkable imo, but defer to your own judgement on what you make of them.