Oh, I agree that's the correct answer. I just don't see the article actually ending up with that answer. I see it waffling. Basically, the article ends up saying that, well, we told you about all this dodgy stuff, but what he's doing is working.

Trusted to increase shareholder value is also questionable

God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself...

Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.