| ▲ | unsupp0rted 7 hours ago |
| Us = me and say /r/codex or wherever Codex users are. I've tried both, liked both, but in my projects one clearly produces better results, more maintainable code and does a better job of debugging and refactoring. |
|
| ▲ | sampullman 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's interesting, I actively use both and usually find it to be a toss up which one performs better at a given task. I generally find Claude to be better with complex tool calls and Codex to be better at reviewing code, but otherwise don't see a significant difference. |
| |
| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If you want to find an advocate for Codex that can give a pretty good answer as to why they think it's better, go ask Eric Provencher. He develops https://repoprompt.com/. He spends a lot of time thinking in this space and prefers Codex over Claude, though I haven't checked recently to see if he still has that opinion. He's pretty reachable on Discord if you poke around a bit. | |
| ▲ | aswanson 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Any difference in performance on mobile development? | | |
| ▲ | sampullman 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | For that I'm not so sure. I tried both early 2025 and was disappointed in their ability to deal with a TCA based app (iOS) and Jetpack compose stuff on Android, but I assume Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 are much better. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | rocketpastsix 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| yea Im not in this "us" you speak of. |