> it doesn't really matter in the end

if you have one of the top models in a disruptive new product category where everyone else is sprinting also, sure..

Code quality never really mattered to users of the software. You can have the most <whatever metric you care about> code and still have zero users or have high user frustration from users that you do have.

Code quality only matters in maintainability to developers. IMO it's a very subjective metric

▲

AstroBen 7 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not subjective at all. It's not art.

Code quality = less bugs long term.

Code quality = faster iteration and easier maintenance.

If things are bad enough it becomes borderline impossible to add features.

Users absolutely care about these things.

	▲	0x457 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Okay, but I meant how you measure is subjective. How do you measure code quality? > Users absolutely care about these things. No, users care about you adding new features, not in your ability to add new features or how much it cost you to add features.