The review is also heavily LLM-inflected, to the point of being distracting.

GPTZero gives it a 100% chance of being AI generated, and I've found that these tools may give false negatives from a well-prompted model, but false positives are rare.

If you are looking to tune your intuition for AI-written text, here's an interesting list of their quirks (ironically provided as a Claude skill for removing those quirks from emitted text):

https://github.com/stephenturner/skill-deslop/blob/main/refe...

▲

geoffschmidt an hour ago | parent [-]

I'm not so sure about false positives being rare.. ZeroGPT flags the Gettysburg Address as 96% AI generated:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1s0y...

(I tried it just now and got the same result as in that post)

	▲	mkeeter an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Fair enough, I accept "the blog post was written by someone from the 1800s" as an alternative hypothesis. edit: For what it's worth, I also just tested the Gettysburg Address (using the "Bliss Copy" from [1]), and got a "100% Human" score. [1] https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/gettys...