| ▲ | randomNumber7 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It probably depends on what people think about the laws that define what a "real crime" is. E.g. in germany it was a real crime to grow some weed. Now it's legal, but even before a lot of reasonable people didn't want someone go to jail over weed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | twodave 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
No, it doesn't, at least not to me. I can disagree with a law while also agreeing to obey it and that those who break it should have consequences. I can hold these two opposing ideas because that is the basis by which governments function. If everybody gets to decide for themselves what should be/not be a crime, then we don't have a society. Society is about compromise. What I'm seeing is not compromise. What I'm seeing is people dismissing the whole of law because there's one they don't agree with, or an application or even abuse of the law that offends them. It's an abandonment of balance and a dismissing of rational conversation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | signatoremo 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sure, but do you consider this specific case a real crime? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||