I'm at a 5, and only because I've implemented a lot of guardrails, am using a typed functional language with no nulls, TDD red/green, and a good amount of time spent spec'ing. No way I'd be comfortable enough this high with a dynamic language.

I could probably get to a 7 with some additional tooling and a second max 20 account, but I care too much about the product I'm building right now. Maybe for something I cared less about.

IMO if you're going 7+, you might as well just pick a statically typed and very safe (small surface area) language anyways, since you won't be coding yourself.

▲

eikenberry 8 hours ago | parent [-]

You aren't leveling up here... these levels are simple measures of how you use the tools to do something. You can regularly do things from any level or multiple levels at the same time.

	▲	rapind 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		So... you're saying "Level 10: Rogue bots, zero human attention" isn't aspirational?
	▲	saulpw 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I don't know why you're being downvoted, I agree that "more != better" with these levels. It's just a descriptor of how much human vs AI attention was given to a task/PR.