From Filippo's post: "Sure, papers about an abacus and a dog are funny and can make you look smart and contrarian on forums."

If only we had a technology where an author could specify a unique identifier and name of another author's paper. Something that could cite a different paper and link to it.

Is that even a rebuttal? Seems like just a dismissal without any substance. I expect in 10 years the predictions will be wrong, kind of like Y2K all over again.