| ▲ | aaroninsf 4 hours ago | |
I read this. It's got some provocative ideas, which Stephen foregrounds. It's got a great hook, and like most writing incubated under circumstances like this, it leans hard into polished sharp introduction into a well-considered world with a very specific flavor. It's also—no better way to put it—crappy as a novel. It's not because the author can't string sentences together. It's because that's not what makes a novel function as a novel. Epic opening and premise establishment: 10/10 Nice "plot twist", predictable in its inevitability if not its specifics; conforms to genre: 7/10 Narrative arc: 2/10 Ability to sustain meaningful tension and interest while working through the de rigeur mechanics of filling hundreds of pages: 1/10 I get that there is a new readership with different expectations and styles of reading. (Looking at you tiktok; looking at you Dungeon Crawler Carl; looking at most successful YA fiction especially that which gets SPICEY and is released in 8-book series with a new volume every 11 months) If you're silverback and relish long-form fiction as previously conceived: set expectations accordingly. | ||
| ▲ | doug_durham 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I am a "silverback" and have read all of the classics of the SciFi genre and I loved this novel. An unconventional topic like this isn't going to fit all of the norms of writing. I thought it was well written and I love his dialog. I'm looking forward to future work. | ||