In my opinion cramming invisible subagents are entirely wrong, models suffer information collapse as they will all tend to agree with each other and then produce complete garbage. Good for Anthropic though as that's metered token usage.

Instead, orchestrate all agents visibly together, even when there is hierarchy. Messages should be auditable and topography can be carefully refined and tuned for the task at hand. Other tools are significantly better at being this layer (e.g. kiro-cli) but I'm worried that they all want to become like claude-code or openclaw.

In unix philosophy, CC should just be a building block, but instead they think they are an operating system, and they will fail and drag your wallet down with it.

▲

andai 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Isn't Claude Code supposed to be like a person? What would the Unix equivalent of that be?

▲

Aperocky 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can't define a product to be "like a person", there is more variance there than any rational product.

I'm purely arguing on technical basis, "person" may fall into either of those camps of philosophy.

▲

gloosx 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

File. In Unix everything is a file.

	▲	mghackerlady 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		honestly if local LLMs become easier to implement in the future due to dedicated hardware, the Unix-like thing I'm working on might actually get this

▲

dnaranjo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]