how is everyone reviewing ai-generated tools/ai-generated websites like these? I cannot keep up with all of these

bayarearefugee 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I just ignore it all, its just a bunch of useless cruft that nobody needs that people are throwing out there to seem AI-relevant.

If you need to know "Should we migrate to GraphQL?" (the example on the site) and your brain is already AI-mushed to the point where you can't deduce this yourself, just ask the model directly, it doesn't need 9 layers of slop-built bullshit stacked on top to answer this question.

	▲	aid-ninja 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I broadly agree with you but if you use claude code you should give this a try, the website doesn't really do it justice but wheat really solves for a lot of pain points when using claude for longer sessions

▲

insin 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I only stay on this particular variant of one of the 5 site designs every LLM spits out for long enough to check that - yes - it has the annoying thing where content fades in as you scroll, before closing the tab.

	▲	goodmythical 12 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They got that from humans who made websites. Ergo, the existence of the effect is not an effective filter for determining use of an LLM in the creation of the website.
	▲	aid-ninja 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		if you like wheat, check out farmer & orchard (both are really cool)

▲

throwaway290 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't have to review them just ask your llm to make the same thing if you really want it;)

	▲	aid-ninja 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I literally just tell claude, here is the deekwiki please use this tool for the next task lol