| ▲ | Lerc 3 hours ago | |
Humans are older than money, so evidently we don't need it to survive, but there is more to existence than mere survival. I agree that people's basic needs to be taken care of, but I think that is an issue that needs to happen because of automation. It needs to happen because it is simply the right thing to do. I would go as fas as saying It shouldn't just be basic needs. Society should be aiming to provide the entire hierarchy of needs for everyone. I think having employment delivers some of the higher needs to a subset of people, but it is a privileged few. A huge number work just to provide the basic needs. Advocating using the advances in automation to raise everybody up is what we need. Instead we seem to be maintaining a system that gives a few what we want and the rest of us are too busy with the survival part to influence that change. | ||
| ▲ | andsoitis an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> Society should be aiming to provide the entire hierarchy of needs for everyone. I don’t know. Society should provide the framework within which people can achieve their needs (and wants), but not the needs and wants themselves directly. Otherwise you put an artificial cap on human growth and inefficient allocation of resources. | ||