| ▲ | nkohari 6 hours ago | |||||||
You're comparing apples to oranges there. Qwen 3.5 is a much larger model at 397B parameters vs. Gemma's 31B. Gemma will be better at answering simple questions and doing basic automation, and codegen won't be it's strong suit. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kgeist 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Qwen3.5 comes in various sizes (including 27B), and judging by the posts on HN, /LocalLlama etc., it seems to be better at logic/reasoning/coding/tool calling compared to Gemma 4, while Gemma 4 is better at creative writing and world knowledge (basically nothing changed from the Qwen3 vs. Gemma3 era) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | tredre3 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Gemma 4 31B is still not impressive at coding compare to even Qwen 3.5 27B. It's just not its strong suit. So far gemma 4 seems excellent at role playing, document analysis, and decent at making agentic decisions. | ||||||||
| ||||||||