| ▲ | Code Freezes can have the opposite effect(jensrantil.github.io) | |||||||
| 14 points by JensRantil 13 hours ago | 3 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | trustfixsec 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Lived this many times. the worst part about these freezes is what happens right before the freeze - everyone will rush to push their changes prior to cutoff, which is exactly when you get the sloppiest commits. and then after the freeze lifts you get a flood of piled up changes all at once. Smaller, continuous deploys with a good rollback are way less risky than big batched releases after a freeze. | ||||||||
| ▲ | WolfeReader 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I cannot fathom why anyone would use a code freeze. Just create a branch at the commit you want to "freeze" and let dev teams keep working with their regular branches. | ||||||||
| ||||||||