| ▲ | Women were never meant to give birth on their backs(bbc.com) |
| 43 points by ilt 13 hours ago | 6 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | downboots 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Might one suggest the Blonsky device
https://allthatsinteresting.com/blonsky-device (ianad) |
|
| ▲ | ViktorRay 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder what it would take to get hospitals to change how women give birth based on this scientific evidence. |
| |
| ▲ | msephton 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The hospital my wife first gave birth at were very accommodating with her request. I think education of the individuals is a bigger issue than the hospitals (who have probably send and done all different ways.) | |
| ▲ | conception 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hospitals are starting to bring midwives and doulas back. Of course, educating women and families about their options and pushing back on inducing labor and c sections would help as well. | | |
| ▲ | setopt 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | If the water actually broke, inducing labor can be important to reduce the risk of infection though, since bacteria can easily get into the amniotic fluid. If the water didn’t break yet, then at least where I live they don’t induce unless you go so much over the expected birth date that there is a high risk you’ll need C-section if you wait more (in Northern Europe they generally don’t offer C-sections unless medically required). |
|
|
|
| ▲ | thomassmith65 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I was curious about the claim so I did a web search for "Roman depiction of birth" and this is the first result: https://www.worldhistory.org/img/c/p/1200x627/18720.jpg The mother appears to be sedentary, rather than supine. I doubt I would have noticed that detail had I not read the article. |