The article is mistaken on a number of linguistic points. For example 们 was used to mark plurals way before some 19th century translation, if you look at things that were written in the vernacular and not in Classical Chinese.

▲

krackers 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's AI generated, so it's no wonder the facts are a bit off.

	▲	QuesnayJr an hour ago \| parent [-]
		AI tends towards regurgitating conventional wisdom. I suspect if it was written using AI it required some bullying to get it to go alone.