This article would be so much better without the generic AI-generated images everywhere.

sschueller 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed but I didn't want to just take random images from the web that I don't have the rights too and I my artistic skills are not good enough.

▲

LoganDark 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You could just not generate extra images that aren't relevant to the article. I like the charts and diagrams even when they're AI, because they serve a purpose. But the extra images for flair or whatever are completely pointless and even annoying.

▲

Svip 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I would go a little further (and apologies for being rather blunt): but I find the over-use of irrelevant images to be rather insulting, as if I am unable to maintain focus on an article, without the frequent shiny object.

	▲	LoganDark 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I wouldn't necessarily call that further. The images I like are relevant because they visually explain things that are helpful. The images I don't like are irrelevant because they serve no purpose other than to Be Images for no good reason.

▲

sschueller 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ok thanks. I will keep that in mind for my next post.

▲

0xsn3k 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

i agree, i do like the article content itself, but the AI-generated images (clearly nano banana btw) really kill the credibility. even just using stock images with the watermarks clearly visible would be better