| ▲ | wiether 4 hours ago | |
I do agree with the fact that more and more people are going to take advantage of agentic coding to write their own tools/apps to maker their life easier.
And I genuinely see it as a good thing: computers were always supposed to make our lives easier.But I don't see how it can be used as an argument for "code quality is becoming less and less relevant". If AI is producing 10 times more lines that are necessary to achieve the goal, that's more resources used. With the prices of RAM and SSD skyrocketing, I don't see it as a positive for regular users. If they need to buy a new computer to run their vibecoded app, are they really reaping the benefits? But what's more concerning to me is: where do we draw the line? Let's say it's fine to have a garbage vibecoded app running only on its "creator" computer. Even if it gobbles gigabytes of RAM and is absolutely not secured. Good. But then, if "code quality is becoming less and less relevant", does this also applies to public/professional apps? In our modern societies we HAVE to use dozens of software everyday, whether we want it or not, whether we actually directly interact with them or not. Are you okay with your power company cutting power because their vibecoded monitoring software mistakenly thought you didn't paid your bills? Are you okay with an autonomous car driving over your kid because its vibecoded software didn't saw them? Are you okay with cops coming to your door at 5AM because a vibecoded tool reported you as a terrorist? Personally, I'm not. People can produce all the trash they want on their own hardware. But I don't want my life to be ruled by software that were not given the required quality controls they must have had. | ||