| ▲ | p2detar 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This is an unfair and a straw man argument, is it not? Are you also unhappy that in a democracy the 51% choose how the other 49% are going to be governed? Why device attestation is required is quite well explained by this github comment [0]. I am in the industry and I agree fully with it, because it is a fact a problem for most smart phone users in terms of security. 0 - https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/eudi-app-andro... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Hackbraten 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think your analogy is flawed. I can be part of the losing 49% and still be entitled to receive the same services as the 51%, whereas people who chose a privacy-oriented OS are essentially going to be excluded from essential governmental services. That's a whole different kind of thing. I'm not going to replace my 1200 EUR smartphone with a device that forces me to have an account with Apple or Google. I've been issued a German identity card, which is its own computer that includes a digital identity already. I also own an expensive card reader, which together forms a system that is completely capable of supporting any attestation anyone would need. They should just stop excluding me already. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | shakna 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If it requires a Google or Apple account, then it also requires those companies never cease an account, either. Or vulnerable people will be harmed. | |||||||||||||||||