| ▲ | Families Can Now Eat Some Fish from Hudson River for First Time in 50 Years(health.ny.gov) |
| 27 points by geox 2 days ago | 8 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | jghn a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| I moved to the mid-hudsoen river valley in the late 90s. It blew my mind that there was material going around saying it was *finally* safe to eat 1-2 fish a year that were caught in it. Polution is a big deal. |
|
| ▲ | nicwolff 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Maybe April Fool's Day was the wrong day to release that. |
|
| ▲ | kgwxd a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Just families? Not individuals? |
| |
| ▲ | Rebelgecko a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Correct, for some individuals a single fish exceeds the recommended monthly max serving. But by splitting a fish with family members you can reduce your PCB consumption to acceptable levels (that's polychlorinated biphenyls, not circuit boards) | |
| ▲ | rhet0rica a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sadly they had to close that loophole where so-called family "members" could claim individuality, bypassing the spirit of the legislation. Science has yet to determine where corporate personhood falls in this paradigm. | |
| ▲ | nottorp a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's illegal if you're single. | | |
| ▲ | fgfarben a day ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | nottorp a day ago | parent [-] | | That's what the article title says. "Families Can Now Eat". Obviously implying single people can't. Should I get a MRI or the article author? |
|
|
|