Remix.run Logo
petre 2 hours ago

What do we do if another asteroid strikes, raises dust plumes and causes volcanic activity for years? The solution is to diversify renewable energy sources.

Nuclear takes to long to plan and build. If that is fixed, then great.

marcosdumay 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> What do we do if another asteroid strikes, raises dust plumes and causes volcanic activity for years?

A few nuclear plants will do absolutely nothing against a nuclear winter.

JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> solution is to diversify renewable energy sources

There are two economically-viable renewable sources: solar and wind. Everything else is, to put it succinctly, bullshit.

We're not producing and deploying as much solar and wind as we can. But global production has limits. Going all in on just those two (together with batteries) requires massively overpaying. That, in turn, makes the economy uncompetitive.

> Nuclear takes to long to plan and build. If that is fixed, then great

Permitting takes forever, too. Nuclear can be done quicker and cheaper, we've seen China do that. It's a good part of the mix because we just need to add power, and ideally, with economies of scale.

pfdietz 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Geothermal is also looking promising, probably more so than nuclear.

JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Geothermal is also looking promising

Europe should absolutely develop it. But it's no panacea.

Optimistically, "around 43 GW of enhanced geothermal capacity in the European Union could be developed at costs below 100 €/MWh" [1]. That's 3% of European energy demand [2].

[1] https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/hot-stuff-geotherma...

[2] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php... 36.6k PJ/year ~ 1,160 GW

stop50 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Especially in the eiffel region.