| ▲ | ggm 2 days ago | |
An article for those who read both because none of the grammatical exemplars are really explained. You have to take his word for it without transliteration or explanation. | ||
| ▲ | picture 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Probably true. Though as someone who can read both English and Chinese, I thought the translations in the article does a good job of representing the traditional vs modern grammar styles. Not sure what more explanation would be necessary | ||
| ▲ | agency 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Did you want the article to teach you read Classical Chinese? | ||