> This sounds like FUD to get people to abandon one of our strongest cognitive enhancing toolsof all time

AI's existence is like the mental equivalent of a heavy weighted barbell that also happens to be edible and tastes delicious. You could use it in a way to get in great shape, you could also use it in a way where you get type 2 diabetes.

It is up to you and your own experiences to decide how that is likely to go for most people.

▲

erelong 2 days ago | parent [-]

Exactly... I mean the article is "tautological nonsense". Misuse a hammer and you hit your hand, use it well and you drive nails quicker. That's why I just dismiss these posts as FUD from the rich who want people to turn in their hammers so they can move along quicker with less competition.

	▲	jdlshore 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It’s a report on what looks a very well-researched study. You may not like the results, but calling it nonsense is ridiculous. Did you even read the article?
	▲	intended 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I’ve just gone through 3 separate papers on the cognitive impact on GenAI, and the points being raised are far more nuanced than what you are assuming them to be. I mean, you could read the papers themselves, they aren’t inimical to your position by nature. For example, one of the more salient results is that the more confident you are in AI, the less likely you are to check the output. When a new invention arrives on the scene, its properties need to be mapped.