> A particular concern, they said, was threats made by the US to Iran’s energy infrastructure. “International law protects from attack objects indispensable to the survival of civilians, and the attacks threatened by Trump, if implemented, could entail war crimes.”

I am not going to lie, I am beyond disgusted at the United States.

And the "it's Trump" card doesn't work, Americans defend this travesty of an old non functioning constitution.

▲

rootusrootus 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It was a pretty solid setup when everyone wanted it to succeed. We will get a few more safeties put in place via statute after this experience, of course, but what really needs to happen is meaningful improvements to the Constitution. We know enough now to spot plenty of weak points which could be addressed. When I'm feeling particularly spicy I think a Constitutional Convention would be seriously awesome. But then I think of the possible outcomes and I'm not so sure. Were the majority of the population acting in good faith, I'd feel better about it.

▲

0cf8612b2e1e 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The bulk of our politicians are fully corrupt, and you believe there could be a positive outcome for rewriting the constitution?

	▲	rootusrootus 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I thought I made it clear that I don't generally think that would be a good idea. I think it would be interesting, which I sometimes think might be worth the risk. Certainly discontent with the status quo is a broadly held sentiment not at all unique to the current right wing.