| ▲ | reaperducer 3 hours ago | |
markdown tried very hard to encode conventions that were already used in Usenet, email, and other text media For those of you who weren't there:
I've been using these for almost half a century. They're much easier and more intuitive than Markdown. I see no compelling reason to change. | ||
| ▲ | nostrademons 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Your quotation and list syntax should work out of the box in most Markdown flavors (HN has a very non-standard and crippled version - basically nothing other than italics, paragraphs, and code/preformatting works.) Strikethrough and bold are doubled to avoid common ambiguities. Your underline should technically work, but it comes out as an <em> (emphasis) tag, which is rendered as italics in most browsers. | ||
| ▲ | dingaling 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
But Usenet style didn't have a trendy name, an 'inventor' or Github stars. So it didn't exist. | ||