I am a developer by profession and this is the opposite of what I would want. The code is your ground truth. If all else fails, the code should reasonably be able to tell you why, and by being able to read it, it makes me independent from some closed model.

▲

toxik 3 days ago | parent [-]

"I have never woodworked a day in my life, with Claude Carpenter I don't have to touch the work at all and can just vaguely ask for things and pray that it does something useful."

▲

darkhorse222 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

If you're inexperienced you have no bookcase at all, going from that to a rickety bookcase is an enormous improvement.

(Perhaps this is why some devs dislike it, perhaps they place the quality of their work very very high)

▲

chamomeal 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean claude carpenter sounds pretty sick

	▲	WillAdams 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Until it builds a stairway which leads to an attic in such a way that the access is under the shallowest part of the roof and unusable. I've tried using the 3D generation stuff a bit, but it never worked out. Still amazed that folks such as: https://www.reddit.com/r/openscad/comments/1adcw41/i_am_comp... manage to get anything usable in 3D at all, but making an STL is a big difference from making a useful architectural structure.