| ▲ | klausa 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
That seems more “oh we fucked up and didn’t realize our changes to the law imply this” than “Germany forces men to request permission to leave”. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | haukem 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It is very likely this was done intentionally. Maybe not all people involved in making this law noticed it, but the person working on article 2 did this intentionally. They explicitly list that this article is always active now: > (3) Außerhalb des Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfalls gelten die §§ 3, 8a bis 20b, 25, 32 bis 35, 44 und 45. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | raffael_de 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Highly doubt it. This is a very new addition. Their fuck up was to pretend for ideological reasons that a country doesn't need an army. And that the concept of considering a country home and its culture as something worth preserving is just right wing bs. Now they are surprised that only very few men deliberately registered for armed service ... | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||