It's also a warcrime, of course. I wonder if, if they lied, is it still a warcrime? I would expect it is.

I guess we'll see what the consequences are to warcrimes. Massive worldwide demonstrations in favor of the people committing warcrimes, like usually?

▲

cogman10 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

What motivation would Iran have to not commit war crimes?

It's not as if the US and Israel are restraining themselves from committing war crimes. Certainly the UN isn't going to step in and do anything.

This war started with the US committing a war crime (blowing up a girl's school).

▲

reddozen 3 days ago | parent [-]

...what? What does the UN have to do with war crimes lol. And why would the US care about war crimes we literally aren't signatory to the Rome statute. how could your comment get so many things wrong in so little text.

▲

yread 3 days ago | parent [-]

war crimes don't have anything to do with Rome, Rome is only about prosecution by ICC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

▲

jasomill 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

And while the US is a member of the UN and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (not the ICC), as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, it also has the power to unilaterally veto any enforcement action (as do China, France, Russia, and the UK).

▲

reddozen 2 days ago | parent [-]

Ok? The ICC prosecutes war crimes in complementarity. The ICJ does not. Not sure what UN Security Council has to do with anything? I can't tell if this is AI. Add to your slop context you're probably thinking of IHL.

	▲	spwa4 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		What you are leaving out is that governments can choose whether the ICC definition of warcrime applies to their territory. Iran has chosen that the Rome treaty, and the ICC, does not apply to Iran. It has even used this fact to request the ICC drop cases against them. We all know why: 99.99% of warcrimes on Iranian territory were committed by Iran's islamist regime. So Rome statute warcrimes are a legal impossibility in Iran. The Rome statute, that law and that definition of warcrime does not apply to anything happening in Iran.

▲

reddozen 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You do recognize the contradiction saying Rome Statute has nothing to do with war crimes, then saying Rome Statute is how you prosecute war crimes right?

▲

2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]

▲

sthkr 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Datacenters aren't categorized for warcrimes. Desalination plants, water treatment plants, power plants, etc. would be highly significant for millions of the population.

▲

tharmas 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are there any military personnel working at the Oracle Facility? Big Tech is very much used in this War so not a stretch to imagine military personnel working there.

Apparently the hotels that were struck in Dubai etc were attacked because US military personnel were working remotely there due to US bases being damaged.

▲

whynotmaybe 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Outside of the countries involved, Is it really a war crime though?

If Oracle's providing services to your enemy's army aren't they a "legitimate" target just like a tank factory?

	▲	__patchbit__ 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		“Israel and the powerful American lobby” don't sign the guestbook when they speak behind closed doors planning the Occupied Territories Cancer in the U.S. Congress and Senate, Gaza.