| ▲ | ronsor 7 hours ago | |||||||
The social contract was "your ads aren't annoying or invasive, and don't waste my time, so I earn you some money" But ads are all of those things now, so I feel no obligation. I only got an ad blocker around the time ads were becoming excessively irritating. | ||||||||
| ▲ | macNchz 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Beyond just invasive/annoying, ad networks explicitly spread malware and scams/fraud. There's not much incentive for them to clamp down on it, though, as that would cost them money both in lost revenue and in paying for more thorough review. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | throwawayqqq11 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Figure this: You could plaster a page with the most obtrusive ads imaginable without ever showing a cookie banner, when they collect no private info. Most people, including folks on here, think cookie banners are a problem, but they are just an annoying attempt to phish your agreement. As long as these privacy loopholes exist, we will keep hearing such stories even from large corporations with much to loose, which means the current privacy regulations do not go far enough. | ||||||||
| ▲ | michaelt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> The social contract was "your ads aren't annoying or invasive Even back in the 1990s the internet was awash with popups, popunders and animated punch-the-monkey banner ads. And with the speed of dial up, hefty images slows down page loads too. You must be a true Internet veteran if you remember a time ads weren’t annoying! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | leptons 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I remember how I felt the first time I saw an ad come across my browser, it seems so long ago - I guess it was more than a quarter century ago now. I knew it was going to be downhill from there, and it has been. | ||||||||
| ||||||||