| ▲ | kpw94 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
That's not using tech that you're describing here. You're talking about literally learning some basic computer skills (such as word processor, excel, reading email, some basic website building, use printer, and some amount of programming) For those, obviously you need a computer and completely agree that those are important skills to learn... But you maybe need to spend 1h/week during last 2 years of middle school on those at the computer lab (as it's been done since the 90s in many schools around the world) But for any other course such as Math, English (or whichever primary language in your country), second languages, history, etc. : that's where using tech is a mistake A bit of tech is ok, but it cannot be "everyone does their homework and read lesson on a iPad/Chromebook" | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rz2k 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
I am pretty skeptical about the value of learning to build websites. I think it is too tempting for students to devote significant time to something that is not foundational knowledge and where they won't get any valuable feedback anyway. It makes me think back to my writing assignments in grades 6-12. I spent considerable time making sure the word processor had the exact perfect font, spacing, and formatting with cool headers, footers, and the footnotes, etc. Yet, I wouldn't even bother to proofread the final text before handing it in. What a terrible waste of a captive audience that could have helped me refine my arguments and writing style, rather than waste their time on things like careless grammatical errors. Anyway, I do agree with the idea of incorporating Excel, and even RStudio for math and science as tools, especially if they displace Ed-tech software that adds unnecessary abstractions, or attempts to replace interaction with knowledgeable teachers. One other exception might be Anki or similar, since they might move rote memorization out of the classroom, so that more time can be spent on critical thinking. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fasterik 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
Would it be a mistake to use Desmos in a math classroom, or 3Blue1Brown style animations, to build up visual intuition? Should we not teach basic numerical and statistical methods in Python? Should kids be forced to use physical copies of newspapers and journal articles instead of learning how to look things up in a database? I'm all for going back to analog where it makes sense, but it seems wrongheaded to completely remove things that are relevant skills for most 21st century careers. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | liveoneggs 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
what's funny is that they don't even teach basic tech literacy but just rely on kids to figure it out! | ||||||||||||||||||||