| ▲ | SoftTalker 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> never-before-seen views of “the far side of the Moon“ I guess not counting all the prior "views" that have been recorded since the Apollo missions, including Chinese orbiters which (according to Wikipedia) "scanned the entire Moon in unprecedented detail, generating a high definition 3D map that would provide a reference for future soft landings" | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | procflora 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article is plagued by several almost-truths, and gets a lot mixed up. The thing that is happening for the first time on this mission is humans personally observing much of the far side in daylight. For the Apollo missions the far side was mostly dark because they wanted a high sun angle at the landing site on the near side. Many uncrewed orbiting cameras and even a recent Chinese lander & rover have taken photos of the far side. It also states that these will be images "from the surface" of the Moon which is wildly off base. Artemis II is not landing... Of course it's true that this O2O technology could be used for high bandwidth livestreams from the surface on future missions, if this test works well. I don't even think this O2O system will be used for live video during Artemis II. This and several other similar articles all appear to reference a NASA press release that is about the technology in general. The mission-specific NASA reference I found[1] says they will transmit a pre-recorded video "in the lunar vicinity" at 4k using the O2O system, so I would guess this claim of a "livestream" is just misstated. [1]: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/a2-reference... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | firesteelrain 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A more accurate claim would be: never-before-seen in real-time at that fidelity from lunar distance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fxtentacle 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Those were transmitted offline so they didn't have authentic NVENC H264 compression artifacts. Never before have you seen it with 260 Mbps ;) /s | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||