| ▲ | b112 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ink is getting cheaper and cheaper, there's a lot of 6" screen devices for $100. If it dropped to $100 for a 11" screen, that would be a respectable size for a magazine. I cite eink as most are distraction free, or can be, and are very easy on the eyes. Such content would also suck with flashy ads too. It's pretty easy tech I think, it's just never hit a flash point. But it could. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mrguyorama 4 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You miss the point. We literally had all of this. We had regular, affordable, high quality printed media for every hobby and interest and industry, that you could get delivered to your home address and collect in your own archive if you want, and your local library could do the same. Those pieces of paper could not track anything about you. They tried, selling their subscriber lists, but that was the best tracking they could provide! You could easily ignore ads, and in return they had to make ads interesting enough in various ways that you might look at them anyway, or they had to make their ads directed at people who went looking for whatever you were selling. It was an objectively better system in every way. The Sears catalog was worlds better than Amazon. You weren't going to buy a fraudulent item for one. Tech is a failure. It has made so much worse. It has only served to allow businesses to cut costs while extracting money from every single local community that used to allow such cash to circulate locally. We should ban all internet advertising. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||