I'd be very happy with an internet without ads. Not that I see any ads anyway.

OhMeadhbh 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think the damage is there even if you don't see the ads. News outlets and organizations that used to be magazine publishers focus on lowest common denominator stories they know will get the highest engagement. That usually means sexy anger-bait.

Sure we had that in the print times, but we had a lot more "slow" content that you could sit with and contemplate over a day, week or month.

	▲	MetaWhirledPeas 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> publishers focus on lowest common denominator stories they know will get the highest engagement One of my favorite uses of AI is to ask it, "what are today's headlines?" You completely bypass all of the sensational nonsense.

▲

lastofthemojito 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Even those of us who don't see ads see the structure that the ad-driven internet economy creates. Listicles, clickbait and AI-generated slop web pages, just trying to get more ad impressions. Sure, with an ad blocker I can see the low-quality content without an ad, but without the ad economy hopefully there'd be less incentive to create low-quality content to begin with.