| ▲ | manoDev 9 hours ago | |
I understand the need of terminal emulator for certain interactive programs, but inside Emacs I just use 'shell-command and output buffers. What's the benefit of having a terminal emulator inside the Emacs process? If the program is interactive (TUI) it won't integrate well with Emacs buffers/keybindings anyway right? | ||
| ▲ | ionrock 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I haven't tried this project, but did switch to vterm from shell-mode a while back because it managed to fix most of the paper cuts when using shell-mode. I also used to create a lot of custom compilation buffers for things b/c it would create links to files that were helpful, but that has been less helpful to me. At the end of the day, there were papercuts that made shell-mode and compilation buffers less ideal and most folks were focusing on traditional terminal support. | ||
| ▲ | dmm 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
My main use case is emacsclient and vterm as a terminal multiplexer, in place of something like tmux or screen. But even locally I use vterm. A terminal is just text, why wouldn't I manipulate it with emacs? At any time you can switch to `copy-mode` and it behaves like a read-only text buffer that you can manipulate as you please. | ||
| ▲ | skydhash 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
None really. And for most cases, the included term is more than enough. | ||