| ▲ | Someone 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t see this article showing that. They query for extensions that could be used to do that, and that likely already is illegal, but those queries could solely be used to uniquely identify users (grabbing more bits makes it less likely to get collisions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hedora 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The list of queried extensions includes things that would be used by particular religious groups, and people with certain medical conditions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | glenstein 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
From the "Why It's Illegal" section: >Political opinions >LinkedIn scans for Anti-woke (“The anti-wokeness extension. Shows warnings about woke companies”), Anti-Zionist Tag (“Adds a tag to the LinkedIn profiles of Anti-Zionists”), Vote With Your Money (“showing political contributions from executives and employees”), No more Musk (“Hides digital noise related to Elon Musk,” 19 users), Political Circus (“Politician to Clown AI Filter,” 7 users), LinkedIn Political Content Blocker, and NoPolitiLinked. >Each of these extensions reveals a political position. If LinkedIn detects any of them, it has collected data revealing that person’s political opinions. Article 9 prohibits this. | |||||||||||||||||||||||