| ▲ | adrian_b 2 hours ago | |
I do not think that I have seen any public benchmark for more than a decade that can compare ARM-based CPUs with IBM POWER CPUs. The recent generations of IBM POWER CPUs have not been designed for good single-thread performance but only for excellent multi-threaded performance. So I believe that an ARM CPU from a flagship smartphone should be much faster in single thread that any existing IBM POWER CPU. On the other hand, I do not know if there exists any ARM-based server CPU that can match the multi-threaded performance of the latest IBM POWER CPUs. At least for some workloads the performance of the ARM-based CPUs must be much lower, as the IBM CPUs have huge cache memories and very fast memory and I/O interfaces. The ARM-based server CPUs should win in performance per watt (due to using recent TSMC processes vs. older Samsung processes) and in performance per dollar, but not in absolute performance. | ||
| ▲ | my123 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
After Power9, IBM became uncompetitive multi-core performance against mainstream server CPUs - both x86 and Arm. They didn't keep up with the rise in core counts. And the single thread side isn't that good either, but SMT8 is a quite nice software licensing trick | ||