| ▲ | logicchains 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
>I don't see the advantage of learning 'AI workflows'. Eventually everything that can be learned from a book will be done much better by machines, so for humans to have any chance of being employable they'll need to develop the soft skill of working with intelligent machines. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | randcraw 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Just as "there is no royal road to mathematics", no AI can do your learning for you. The need for memorization of essential math identities (like multiplication tables and use of fractions) or rules of grammar (like verb conjugation or use of anaphora) will never be enhanced by AI. There is an essential role for good old fashioned rote learning that can't be avoided. To pretend AI will not impede that learning is a fool's errand, literally. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pessimizer an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If AI is still too stupid to show people how to work with it, and to notice their lacks and anticipate their needs, it can't have become that indispensably useful. The entire point of AI is to accommodate the user. AI doesn't do anything that people can't do, is worse at most of those things, but is a lot faster at some of them (basically looking up things.) The point of AI is natural language UI. Teaching people how to use AI is just teaching people enough about the world to give them something to ask AI for. | |||||||||||||||||