I'm the person working on that fork. Yes, it has now diverged 200k+ lines, but half of that is specs, research and documentation and includes a month worth of work.

The comment in question was a small feature of about 1.5k lines changed and it was solidly tested.

▲

59nadir 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Eh, fair enough. 1.5k is reasonable. Have you tried just writing it yourself instead? It's likely it'll be less than 1k lines and you should have no problems writing an implementation yourself if you understand the structure of the LLM version.

▲

Deeds67 8 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

▲

59nadir 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Heh, fair enough. To me this comes off as "I'm unable to write it myself [possibly because I've outsourced my thinking too much]", to be honest, but I'm not going to argue; you're the one who presumably wants this code to end up in that repository.

I wouldn't really consider (what is likely) sub-1kloc a "large feature", but to each their own.

	▲	Deeds67 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't want it to end up in that repo anymore, hence the fork. I've got a growing community of people who have been eagerly awaiting this feature and a ton more that I built. I definitely could write this by hand - the stuff I built in the last 10 years before LLMs was more complex than this - but theres no way I'm spending all my free time to slowly craft something if I can just use AI and get the same results much faster