| ▲ | faserx 10 hours ago | |
/r/horsecarriage bans all discussion of cars /r/assembly bans all discussion of 4GL LLM programming isn't going away by not talking about it. It's time to move on, and eventually considering farming. | ||
| ▲ | lelanthran 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> /r/horsecarriage bans all discussion of cars Makes sense. If I'm looking to read discussions about stables selection, feed prices, etc, why would discussions of spark plugs be relevant? > /r/assembly bans all discussion of 4GL Also makes sense; people wanting to discuss register allocation, bit twiddling, etc probably aren't interested in insurance claims taxonomies or similar. > LLM programming isn't going away by not talking about it. Right, but is the context still /r/programming? After all, there are tons of subreddits you can go to to discuss LLM programming. Why do you need to shove it into a space created for human thoughts on programming? > It's time to move on, and eventually considering farming. Okay, understood, but my question still stands - why conflate programming with viber-coding? | ||
| ▲ | xboxnolifes 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
/r/horsecarriages banning discussion of cars makes sense though. It's not a horse carriage. If you want to discuss cars, go to /r/cars. | ||
| ▲ | rzmmm 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It's not about wishing it goes away, it's that people don't want to see JavaScript/Java/Swift blog articles when they visit r/assembly. | ||
| ▲ | vlaaad 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
More like /r/cars bans all discussion of electric cars. | ||
| ▲ | faserx 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
OK I see your point, the problem is more being off-topic rather than the LLM programming itself. And that's correct, we are strict people, after all. | ||