I can't comment on if it was written by AI or not but I found the OP informative and quite dense with useful information. Nothing stood out to me as garbage.

▲

radku 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed. Personally I think about it as massaging a text with LLM is like applying filters to your pictures.

The text probably have been based entirely on the internal notes and investigations and is very informative. Would it be better if the OP wrote it entirely by themselves? Not necessarily.

▲

nubg 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I agree the topic and most of the content is legit!

Which makes is even more annoying. Because you don't know which are the good bits where somebody is sharing his unique insight, and which is just taken from the LLMs world knowledge.

▲

chii 8 hours ago | parent [-]

so you are merely just prejudiced against LLM generated content, even if it was good?

Why not accept that it is good, and forget about it being LLM?

	▲	tholm 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Because sounding skeptical and "clever" is more important to some people than providing meaningful and relevant insight into the topic at hand.
	▲	nubg 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		?? I literally just wrote my main complaint: > Because you don't know which are the good bits where somebody is sharing his unique insight, and which is just taken from the LLMs world knowledge.