This could have been Safari Extension

Instagram is not predominantly used on Safari, so Safari doesn't sound like the best place to implement something like this.

	▲	dnlzro 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The use case for this app (Dull): 1. Uninstall Instagram 2. Install Dull 3. Use Instagram via Dull The use case for a Safari extension: 1. Uninstall Instagram 2. Install the Safari extension 3. Use Instagram via Safari Am I missing something that is obviously better about Dull (which couldn't be replicated by a Safari extension)? (P.S. this is not meant to discourage the developer of Dull; I like the idea and your implementation seems really good.)
	▲	kelnos 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If someone is already sold on the idea of uninstalling the Instagram app and using something else to access Instagram, how is it better to install a different app, vs. using the already-installed browser, with an extension?
	▲	nativeit 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Isn’t this just WebKit with some user scripts anyway?