So did they! And they showed their work. So far you're just beating around the bush.

What would would help is if you said something like "Maceij says modeling a different entry approach on computers is no substitute for a bona fide re-entry testing a new design, but that's incorrect because _____."

It's Maciej.

I would, except all Maceij is providing is "vibes" and much of the official report is redacted.