You should expect to be downvoted for being wrong.

It is a scam. "Full Self Driving" isn't even close to Level 3 autonomy or even Level 5.

Tesla got away with this deceptive advertising and scammed [0] their customers believing their vehicles would soon reach full self driving autonomy.

The only ones defending this are likely the ones that still haven't realized that they got scammed by Elon. Sorry that happened to you.

[0] https://www.reuters.com/legal/tesla-must-face-californias-fa...

▲

indoordin0saur 12 hours ago | parent [-]

How is this false opinion so common? I use self-driving regularly it has always worked more or less flawlessly

▲

colejohnson66 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Self-driving is a thing. Full self-driving, commonly known as "level 5 autonomy", has been claimed for over a decade. These claims have been made so many times it has a dedicated Wikipedia page!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autono...

	▲	Rohansi 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But those levels are kind of bullshit. If a car is autonomously driving but needs an attentive driver in the seat for legal reasons you're stuck at what, level 2? Even if you never actually need to override/intervene? Teslas running the latest hardware (manufactured 2023+) and software are actually nearly there, IMO. I used it for two months and never needed to intervene. It's not perfect yet but I believe it actually drives better than most people now. However, the millions of Teslas on the road with older hardware are absolutely useless in comparison where you will need to intervene a lot. The latest FSD software only works on the latest hardware so these older cars are stuck on either old FSD versions (which are proven to be bad) or get slimmed down versions to fit lower specs (which we know wont be as good). It's unsafe and they really should disable it for all of the older vehicles and issue refunds for people who paid for FSD.