Remix.run Logo
nope1000 3 hours ago

What they really should focus on is making those models more efficient. With them most likely losing money on inference (+model training + salaries + building data centers), I can't see why they would want more compute and more products, since more tokens spent is actually bad for them.

MengerSponge 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Making existing models more efficient won't make them God in a Box.

nope1000 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

True but neither will going bankrupt.

bombcar 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They're all in a race to bankrupt the others, and then pivot and raise prices and go efficient fast enough to avoid their own bankruptcy.

We'll see if it works!

MengerSponge an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Ye of little faith. God in a Box will tell them how to not go bankrupt.

BoorishBears an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Except they already did this: if they had scaled 4.5 with RL, 5 would probably have been the leap we expected

If anything 4.5 being abandoned so they could sell India a $3 a month subscription was the first crack in The Box

freehorse an hour ago | parent [-]

Did you really mean to say 4.5? Gpt 4.5 used to cost $75/$150 per million tokens input/output. And it did not even seem to be that good to justify that. I would not expect many people were using it, and I doubt that "expanding to india" was what killed it (if it was that useful/popular they would have kept the api, or keep it for higher end subscriptions).

If anything it should have been no1 in the "openAI graveyard" website.