| ▲ | Razengan 3 hours ago | |
Holy f'n Hell, there's such a blatant bias on HackerNews in favor of Anthropic and against OpenAI. I'm just a user, and in my experience Claude has been consistently crap compared to ChatGPT/Codex. I use both side-by-side, and have paid for a ChatGPT subscription every month for around 1 year, but only 2 months for Claude; once last year, and again since last month. Everything from the sign up, the sign in, the payment, the UI, the UX, gosh, just sucks on Claude. And the AI itself: SO. MUCH. "OoPs you're right! I was mistaken" BACKTRACKING! It's downright DANGEROUS to listen to it! God I can post screenshots of working on the same project and the same prompts with both agents and prove how worse Claude is. Of course this comment will be downvoted by Anthropic's paid PR machine, because there's no way actual users who have tried both products would be so in favor of Claude. | ||
| ▲ | greenchair 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yes I dont get it either. probably bots, paid posts. | ||
| ▲ | p1esk 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I’ve been a paid subscriber for all three players since day 1. CC (Opus) has been a clear winner for agentic coding starting about 6 months ago. GPT5.4 reduced the gap somewhat but the gap is still there. | ||
| ▲ | jmye 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> Of course this comment will be downvoted by Anthropic's paid PR machine, because there's no way actual users who have tried both products would be so in favor of Claude. Sure, it couldn't possibly be that others have had a different experience. It couldn't even be that some people think OpenAI is nearly as gross as Palantir. It's that they're shills. High-end analysis. | ||