| ▲ | AngryData 4 hours ago | |||||||
Jesus I hope they do proper testing for these experimental mixes and don't trust whatever random garbage AI decides you should mix in. This is exactly the kind of thing AI is absolutely terrible at because it has no logical skills or direct experience or ability to test it. If your AI coded stuff goes belly up, you get to try again. If your multi million dollar cement foundation turns out to be sub-par, thats multi million dollars to tear it out and then millions more to do it again right, and that is a best case scenario. The alternative is people dieing when their apartment building collapses. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sebastianeament 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
We use Gaussian processes trained on vetted test data from academic and industry partners. We use these predictions to recommend mixes for onsite testing to accelerate finding mixtures with optimal strength-speed-sustainability trade-offs. None of the data and predictions go untested. The blog post goes into this in more detail. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | k33n 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
AI isn’t just LLMs. | ||||||||
| ▲ | mrbonner 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Can you at least read the article before criticizing them? They explicitly call out that they use Bayesian Optimization (Gaussian process) thing for this. It is "AI" but not "LLM" like you think it is. | ||||||||