Remix.run Logo
halapro 5 hours ago

Yes definitely compare it multiple times to WordPress and nobody will think of calling their lawyers.

Is this April fools? With real products launching on this date you can't really be too sure.

rvz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not an April fools joke. [0]

[0] https://github.com/emdash-cms/emdash

quantummagic 5 hours ago | parent [-]

That makes it look more like an April fools joke. All the commits are from today.

george_perez 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Cloudflare specifically launches things on April 1st a lot of times. https://x.com/Cloudflare/status/1907055975057506793

They announced 1.1.1.1 on April 1st way back in 2018 too.

OJFord 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not unusual though, large companies releasing something open source very often squash the history at launch.

bigbuppo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The best jokes are serious.

echelon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Yes definitely compare it multiple times to WordPress and nobody will think of calling their lawyers.

It's not illegal to make product comparisons. That's just competition.

halapro 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Tell that to the guy who got upset with WP Engine. EmDash is clearly "inspired" by WordPress including in its UI, so there's definitely something to it.

Dylan16807 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>> It's not illegal to make product comparisons. That's just competition.

> Tell that to the guy who got upset with WP Engine.

Why? That situation had nothing to do with comparisons.

chuckadams 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd really love to see Matt go after CloudFlare over the trademark. WPE might grind him into the dust, but CF will obliterate every constituent atom.

rectang 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The phrase "spiritual successor to WordPress" is not likely to be judged a trademark violation, though. It doesn't create confusion in the marketplace as to whether Emdash is WordPress.

danudey 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The problem with WP Engine was that the name is confusing to users who aren't familiar with it. Presumably the WordPress Engine is the core of Wordpress? Or it's the thing powering Wordpress? It's easy to see ways in which an end user could be confused which was which.

Conversely, this product is called something else, and while their blog post references Wordpress repeatedly it's in a way as to make it very clear that this is not that.

chuckadams 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Matt seemed pretty fine with the name for at least 14 years, including investing in them at one point.

echelon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Matt got upset because they forked his open source project and built a hundred million dollar revenue business on top of it without contributing anything back to WordPress.

He'd have more of a leg to stand on if WordPress wasn't itself a fork of an open source project.

Matt should have built something open core or fair source licensed - free for customers, but stops competitors from stealing your lunch. He has no legal ground to argue his case now.

It's a much bigger deal with hyperscalers poaching and stealing, like AWS and GCP ripping off and stealing most of the revenue from Redis and Elasticsearch. That's dishonest and evil in my mind.

Totally orthogonal to this issue of marketing comparisons.

chuckadams 2 hours ago | parent [-]

WPE never forked a thing. They were a successful company after he backed out of an investment with them, he resented the success, blackmailed them for 8% of their top-line revenue, then threw a tantrum when they told him to pound sand.