It's necessary for devs right now, no matter how good they are, and it's those devs' code the models are trained on

Even worse, the training set probably includes a lot of code that needed review but didn't get it...

	▲	keeda 39 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		If we know the outcome of that code, such as whether it caused bugs or data corruption or a crappy UX or tech debt -- which is potentially available in subsequent PR commit messages -- it's still valuable training data. Probably even more valuable than code that just worked, because evidently we have enough of that and AI code still has issues.