Remix.run Logo
catapart 6 hours ago

in case you don't understand what GP is suggesting: your website does not actually describe what you're providing. A "next generation Rust UI library powered by fine-grained reactivity." could mean a UI for native apps - something like egui or Dioxys - or it could mean a way to use rust to output HTML, CSS, and javascript. Or a bunch of other things. And, regardless, there's no way to look at your website and determine how to get that output using sycamore. I can inspect and see your HTML or your CSS, but there's no Rust code for me to compare that against without going and looking it up somewhere.

To be more succinct: you don't even have an image of your UI running on your websites landing page. Not one single image of the library which is, again, a UI library. People have an interest in knowing "does this look and feel like I want it to?" as well as "can I use this in the projects I'm working on?". Both of those questions should be answered by your landing page. For me, at least, it doesn't do that.

lukechu10 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Hmm thanks for the feedback. The front page definitely has lots of room for improvement.

fnikacevic 5 hours ago | parent [-]

A great example is the shadcn site

https://ui.shadcn.com/

Shows you how good it looks out of the box on the first page.

0x457 an hour ago | parent [-]

That's a component library, Sycamore is no that.

I agree that it have better showcase of what you can build with it, but components library isn't it.