| ▲ | spiderfarmer 4 hours ago | |||||||
Comments like these remind me of the football spectators that shout "Even I could have scored that one" when they see a failed attempt. Sure. You could have. But you're not the one playing football in the Champions League. There were many roads that could have gotten you to the Champions League. But now you're in no position to judge the people who got there in the end and how they did it. Or you can, but whatever. | ||||||||
| ▲ | boomskats 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I don't think this is warranted given that the comment you're criticising is simply expressing an opinion explicitly solicited by the comment it's responding to. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sarchertech 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It’s more like “Player A is better than Player B” coming from a professional player in a smaller league who is certainly qualified to have that opinion. | ||||||||
| ▲ | vardalab 2 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, exactly. I like this analogy. I am surprised the level of pearl clutching in these discussions on Hacker News. Everybody wants to be an attention sharecropper, lol. | ||||||||
| ▲ | troupo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Sure. You could have. But you're not the one playing football in the Champions League. The only reason people are using Claude Code is because it's the only way to use their (heavily subsidized) subscription plans. People who are okay with using and paying for their APIs often opt out for other, better, tools. Also, analogies don't work. As we know for a fact that Claude Code is a bloated mess that these "champions league-level engineers" can't fix. They literally talk about it themselves: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598488 (they had to bring in actual Champions League engineers from bun to fix some of their mess). | ||||||||
| ||||||||